WEBVTT

1
00:00:05.560 --> 00:00:12.699
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you, Allison, so we will. We will start the Railers working group meeting Number 6 with a land acknowledgement.

2
00:00:14.470 --> 00:00:24.880
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): The San Francisco planning department acknowledges that we are on the unseeded ancestral homeland of the Ramitusholoni, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco. Peninsula

3
00:00:25.010 --> 00:00:35.659
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): as the indigenous stewards of this land, and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramitushiola have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place.

4
00:00:35.780 --> 00:00:45.259
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland.

5
00:00:45.430 --> 00:00:56.239
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elder elders, and relatives of the Ramatusian community, and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples.

6
00:00:57.860 --> 00:00:59.100
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you, Alison.

7
00:01:01.230 --> 00:01:04.890
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): so welcome everyone and and thank you for joining us.

8
00:01:05.090 --> 00:01:27.909
We will start with our meeting purpose for today. There's 3 key items, and then I'll move on to the expanded agenda. First, we will be providing updates on caltrans, preliminary business case efforts. This item will be informational with opportunity for clarifying questions. We will dedicate about 10 min to this. Item.

9
00:01:28.220 --> 00:01:41.130
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Then we we will move on to continue to gather input on neighborhood mapping and potential public realm opportunities. This is an explorative item. There will be discussion, presentation, and discussion.

10
00:01:41.780 --> 00:01:47.909
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and the third item will be to provide an overview of the planning context dashboard.

11
00:01:48.080 --> 00:01:53.329
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): This is also an informational item. It should be about 5 to 7 min.

12
00:01:55.310 --> 00:01:59.730
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and we move to our expanded agenda. Here it is

13
00:01:59.980 --> 00:02:09.769
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): we. As part of our opening, we will do our checking and and our agenda checking review of agenda and updates. We will look at any community updates.

14
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:22.700
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and also, as requested by the rail yards working group coordinators. We've been asked to include updates on related projects and efforts. So this is a new item that we have as part of our opening.

15
00:02:22.920 --> 00:02:33.689
Then we will dive in into the content starting with the preliminary business case of culturing efforts, then followed by neighborhood mapping public realm

16
00:02:33.910 --> 00:02:38.359
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and and then finishing with the context, dashboard overview.

17
00:02:38.410 --> 00:02:46.959
We will be closing with group action items and activities and the next steps for the project team.

18
00:02:47.450 --> 00:02:57.499
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So I'd like to ask at this point. If anyone has any other items I would like to be added to the agenda. Please feel welcome to including the chat, or let me know

19
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:05.709
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): with no additional items. Is the group okay, to proceed with this agenda?

20
00:03:06.810 --> 00:03:09.440
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Can I see some nuts or thumbs up.

21
00:03:11.230 --> 00:03:15.590
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I see a few thumbs up. Not great. Okay.

22
00:03:15.730 --> 00:03:26.579
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): great. I'd like to just thank the volunteer group of coordinators, Don Eric and Kuti for their help getting us and helping us develop the agenda.

23
00:03:26.860 --> 00:03:36.339
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): That was we. We really appreciate it. And with that, Alison, I'm gonna pass it on to you to guide us through the community updates.

24
00:03:38.970 --> 00:03:58.689
Allison Albericci: So as we've done in the past. We will start by hearing from you the public and the rail yards working group members. If there is anything going on in your community or announcements things, you wanna let other folks know about

25
00:03:58.740 --> 00:04:05.339
Allison Albericci: this is a moment just to tell us what has happened since we last met.

26
00:04:05.530 --> 00:04:07.559
Allison Albericci: 3 months ago.

27
00:04:18.290 --> 00:04:24.829
Allison Albericci: Are there any items of community feedback and or announcements? Go ahead, Bruce.

28
00:04:26.260 --> 00:04:35.789
Bruce Agid: Yeah, just real briefly. And I'm sure you already know this. But I guess I've heard probably in the last month about a lot of activity.

29
00:04:35.850 --> 00:04:58.290
Bruce Agid: of the developer. I guess Tishman is going to the planning commission for the the towers over there at fourth in Townsend. So I actually saw somebody yesterday and mentioned they mentioned that to me that that was gonna happen. So I'm sure you're already aware of that. But I just thought I'd bring it up for others who may not be.

30
00:04:59.300 --> 00:04:59.990
Allison Albericci: Yeah.

31
00:05:03.800 --> 00:05:08.279
Allison Albericci: Michael, it looks like you're trying to save something. but we can't hear you.

32
00:05:10.560 --> 00:05:12.639
Michael: Oh, no. Sorry I should be on mute.

33
00:05:12.740 --> 00:05:14.059
Michael: There we go. Thanks.

34
00:05:16.170 --> 00:05:17.250
Allison Albericci: Okay.

35
00:05:17.560 --> 00:05:26.449
Allison Albericci: If there's anything else that comes to mind. Please let us know in the chat or you know. Raise your hand or

36
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:30.350
Allison Albericci: We can check in before we adjourn.

37
00:05:30.590 --> 00:05:36.359
Allison Albericci: I did want to check in on a few things

38
00:05:36.400 --> 00:05:42.960
Allison Albericci: that our team are tracking other plans and projects

39
00:05:43.030 --> 00:05:44.850
Allison Albericci: that. Inform

40
00:05:45.170 --> 00:05:58.660
Allison Albericci: our planning area? And and you know, we wanted to give you guys an update on that. We intend to do this regularly at the start of each meeting. So if hopefully, we'll catch

41
00:05:58.680 --> 00:06:01.469
Allison Albericci: items that are of interest.

42
00:06:01.530 --> 00:06:10.329
Allison Albericci: So we'll start with the active community plan. That is an effort by Sfmta to update the citywide bicycle plan.

43
00:06:10.350 --> 00:06:26.139
Allison Albericci: It includes a network of facilities for bicycles and scooters and other micro mobility devices. And that has a 5 to 10 or sorry, a 10 to 15 year implementation horizon. So there's a draft

44
00:06:26.370 --> 00:06:28.529
Allison Albericci: of a network map.

45
00:06:29.210 --> 00:06:35.329
Allison Albericci: One thing to note is that that map does still and does include the Fifth Street.

46
00:06:35.370 --> 00:06:38.229
Allison Albericci: a pedestrian and bike bridge that

47
00:06:38.400 --> 00:06:41.939
we have been talking about and tracking.

48
00:06:42.130 --> 00:06:50.360
Allison Albericci: and for folks who are interested in the active communities plan. They will be a workshop

49
00:06:50.510 --> 00:06:59.500
Allison Albericci: coming up on Saturday, January twentieth. So there's more information about that on the Mta website. Go ahead, Bruce.

50
00:07:02.730 --> 00:07:16.509
Bruce Agid: Thanks for mention that Allison, about different plans are going on. One thing that I didn't mention that I should is so I'm the kind of the lead for the Mission Bay Elementary School Steering Committee.

51
00:07:16.620 --> 00:07:22.250
Bruce Agid: and we just had a presentation from Sfcta

52
00:07:22.390 --> 00:07:30.070
Bruce Agid: and Sfmta the last week of November, and they were initiating a

53
00:07:30.870 --> 00:07:40.040
Bruce Agid: transportation accessibility study for the Mission Bay Elementary School. So I hope you're all. I'm sure you all are aware of that.

54
00:07:40.250 --> 00:07:56.839
Bruce Agid: And if you're not, you should be because that gets into some of things you're just talking about bike lanes and other accessibility measures, and so on. There was a lot of feedback given to them, and they have a very robust, a community engagement plan

55
00:07:56.890 --> 00:08:04.530
Bruce Agid: over the next 6 months, and they want to start in January of 2024. So you know, as

56
00:08:04.540 --> 00:08:11.160
Bruce Agid: you know, there start to be these community engagement plans. I would really recommend that somehow they're integrated.

57
00:08:11.170 --> 00:08:21.709
Bruce Agid: Because, you know, community groups get exhausted with meetings. And why could you all have done this all at the same time, because it's hard to

58
00:08:21.830 --> 00:08:45.780
Bruce Agid: you you get. I see you smile, Allison. So I made my point on that I just wanted to. I just I didn't know if you were aware of that. And it looks like they're gonna be very aggressive because, you know, the the Mission Bay Elementary School is targeted to open August 2025. So whatever they're gonna do, they gotta do quick. So yeah, just Fyi on that. And then the other thing you mentioned that pedestrian bridge

59
00:08:45.780 --> 00:08:55.909
Bruce Agid: across the Channel at at Fifth Street, and I'm sure you're gonna have a very robust engagement strategy with the folks on the house folks.

60
00:08:56.250 --> 00:08:57.849
Bruce Agid: I as always.

61
00:08:58.100 --> 00:09:19.200
Bruce Agid: Yeah, I'm I'm sure you need to, because one of our dear friends who's no longer with us. Had some comments about what that looked like. So I'm sure you're aware of those concerns, and ex access across history is critical and necessary. But of course the folks on the house boats have

62
00:09:19.210 --> 00:09:34.719
Allison Albericci: some some concerns. So I just wanted to make sure that get that on the table. Thank you. Yeah, Bruce, thanks. As always always appreciate your insights. The mission based school access plan. Is that

63
00:09:35.180 --> 00:09:36.150
Allison Albericci: wha wha

64
00:09:36.470 --> 00:09:43.400
Allison Albericci: the the name that we have for that is mission-based school access plan. Is that the same plan that you're talking about?

65
00:09:44.670 --> 00:10:07.650
Bruce Agid: Alison? You, you know your guess is good in mind. I can give you II I've got the I've got the contact information for the people, and I could just make sure that you have it. And you guys could get that squared away. I'm not sure if that's what it's called. It sounds right. Combo between Sf, Cta and Mta

66
00:10:07.870 --> 00:10:13.990
Allison Albericci: got it. Yeah, we think that's the same project. Perfect good to know. Go ahead, Tammy.

67
00:10:14.620 --> 00:10:34.430
Tammy Chan, UCSF: Yeah, I was just gonna pipe in and say that that is the same project cause they've actually reached out to Usf to speak to us about access plan being on the on the edge of our campus site and we also alerted them that the the school district was as part of their eir and and effort. They were supposed to be

68
00:10:35.020 --> 00:10:51.190
Tammy Chan, UCSF: circulating a circulation plan to to sort of support, you know, to understand, like what their circulation planning, and how how the drop off and pick up. And all of these elements are gonna work, so that we can kind of look at this plan along with the Cta plans

69
00:10:51.220 --> 00:11:01.190
Tammy Chan, UCSF: together, and I don't believe that's been provided from the school district. So that's something that I think Sfc Ta was gonna follow the school district on.

70
00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:02.230
Allison Albericci: Yeah.

71
00:11:03.760 --> 00:11:04.600
Allison Albericci: Great

72
00:11:05.990 --> 00:11:07.140
Allison Albericci: thanks, Tammy.

73
00:11:09.260 --> 00:11:17.400
Allison Albericci: So another project that you all might have heard about is the one 1, 2, 80 express lanes bus project

74
00:11:17.480 --> 00:11:38.139
Allison Albericci: also being undertaken by Cta. So our understanding is that that is to evaluate alternatives for Hov lanes from i. 2 80 King Street off-ramp to Fifth Street. There's already an existing space there, but it's not striped as a lane.

75
00:11:38.340 --> 00:11:45.020
Allison Albericci:  so our understanding is to they. They are looking at adding that.

76
00:11:45.090 --> 00:12:02.359
Allison Albericci: And that effort has started and is in progress. 2 other big development projects that are on our radar include the 900 Seventh Street Amazon project

77
00:12:02.450 --> 00:12:28.049
Allison Albericci: on the site formerly owned by ricology. That is a construction of a 3 story parcel delivery service building with accessory office retail and some publicly accessible open space. I'll just let you guys know that the the sponsor has submitted applications, and those applications are under review. But the

78
00:12:28.140 --> 00:12:31.930
Allison Albericci: the plan Review letter's not been sent yet.

79
00:12:32.120 --> 00:12:45.709
Allison Albericci: And then, as Bruce already mentioned, the 6 55 Fourth Street project by Tishman. That project is going to the planning commission for approval on Thursday.

80
00:12:45.750 --> 00:12:50.339
Allison Albericci: so that's 1,100 dwelling units

81
00:12:50.600 --> 00:12:56.229
Allison Albericci: about 10,000 square feet of retail. Some

82
00:12:56.260 --> 00:13:01.760
Allison Albericci: There's also about a 9,000 square foot popos at the corner of Fourth

83
00:13:01.770 --> 00:13:03.190
Allison Albericci: and Townsend.

84
00:13:03.390 --> 00:13:09.289
Allison Albericci: and of course, some other accessory and back of house space.

85
00:13:09.680 --> 00:13:20.679
Allison Albericci: So those are kind of the the large things that are on our radar. and if there's anything else that comes up that you think we should be tracking, please do let us know.

86
00:13:26.490 --> 00:13:27.470
Allison Albericci: Okay.

87
00:13:27.970 --> 00:13:35.369
Allison Albericci: And with that I'm going to hand it over to Dj. With Caltrain for an update on the preliminary business case.

88
00:13:37.880 --> 00:13:54.620
DJ Baxter: Thanks, Allison. Good evening, everybody. I'm Dj. Baxter project manager with capturing for the preliminary business case at the Forth and King Rale Yards. We have several other members of our team here tonight who's help? I may call on and answering questions as nevy Dolly Wall, is our government affairs

89
00:13:54.660 --> 00:14:02.180
DJ Baxter: liaison? And Genevieve Cadwallader is our partner in advancing this work with prolades?

90
00:14:04.080 --> 00:14:16.889
DJ Baxter:  what we wanna do tonight is give a little bit of an overview of the process and an update on where we are with that, and and also talk about how. As we're

91
00:14:17.690 --> 00:14:25.989
DJ Baxter: looking at this site, we are thinking about the operating requirements that are required that are necessary for Cal trained to continue operations here.

92
00:14:27.330 --> 00:14:29.090
DJ Baxter: So let's go to our next slide.

93
00:14:29.370 --> 00:14:41.079
DJ Baxter: This is an over a schedule overview, obviously of a number of projects. You know what we're pursuing here is what just realized my face got blurry, did it for you guys?

94
00:14:41.430 --> 00:14:43.289
DJ Baxter: Not sure what's happening with my camera

95
00:14:46.480 --> 00:14:51.620
DJ Baxter: to fix that? I apologize. See if it comes back into focus there.

96
00:14:55.410 --> 00:14:58.619
DJ Baxter: I'm not sure what's going on with my camera. Is it okay for me to proceed?

97
00:14:59.680 --> 00:15:03.210
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: Yeah, we can hear you. We can hear you just fine. Dj.

98
00:15:03.550 --> 00:15:05.350
DJ Baxter: thanks.

99
00:15:05.630 --> 00:15:18.409
DJ Baxter: so th. This effort is a partnership between Caltrain, who obviously operates trains on the site, and Prologis, who owns the property. And we're looking at options

100
00:15:18.490 --> 00:15:35.590
DJ Baxter: to see what it would take to realize all the benefits that could come from a robust Tod on this site while also providing continued and potentially expanded rail service over time at this location. And so as you can imagine, those

101
00:15:35.610 --> 00:15:54.110
DJ Baxter: th, there's a lot of effort required in trying to coordinate those 2 needs. And so we're looking carefully at what? What it would take to make that possible. This slide gives us a sense of some of the other projects are in the works here. I just want to talk briefly about those. Probably by way of review for many of you.

102
00:15:54.410 --> 00:15:59.940
DJ Baxter: And then after that, I'll talk a little bit of how about how we're approaching the work

103
00:16:02.290 --> 00:16:06.359
DJ Baxter: at the Fourth and King site obviously is an evolving site.

104
00:16:06.530 --> 00:16:24.750
DJ Baxter: where we have a dynamic railroad operation now. And one of the projects that's underway at the moment isn't actually listed on the slide, but the electrification project is underway right now, and expect we expect, in the fall of next year to begin revenue service of electric trains.

105
00:16:24.760 --> 00:16:25.930
DJ Baxter: I think

106
00:16:25.940 --> 00:16:37.339
DJ Baxter: perhaps some of you had a chance to see the electric trains at one of our open houses this fall. There will be one more opportunity. I think it's San Mateo County. We don't have a date set for that yet.

107
00:16:37.390 --> 00:16:46.430
DJ Baxter: But we're excited to provide another opportunity for people to explore those trains. While we're finishing up the Electrification Electrification project.

108
00:16:46.830 --> 00:16:54.450
DJ Baxter:  we've recently electrified 12 platform tracks and

109
00:16:54.560 --> 00:16:56.819
DJ Baxter: that work is proceeding nicely.

110
00:16:57.030 --> 00:17:13.249
DJ Baxter: The portal project is also known as the downtown Extension and this is a an effort to extend California and service from Forth and King all the way to the Salesforce Transit Center, and that would include the development of a new underground station at Fourth and Townson Street.

111
00:17:13.750 --> 00:17:24.979
DJ Baxter: This project obviously will impact parts of the Bale yard site. And I'll show a graphic in a few minutes. And those impacts happen both during construction and after implementation.

112
00:17:25.839 --> 00:17:44.249
DJ Baxter: The next project we're showing here is the 4 KY project construction. That's another name for that is the enabling works for the downtown extension, and that's a pack, a couple of packages of materials that need to be conducted just to prepare for the construction of the downtown extension.

113
00:17:44.320 --> 00:17:55.620
DJ Baxter: Some of those activities are at the seventh, and towns and Corner and others are focused on making sure the rail infrastructure is put in place to to ensure that we can keep the trains running throughout the construction of the Dtx project

114
00:17:56.480 --> 00:18:18.100
DJ Baxter: course. The rail yard cod is what we're here to talk about tonight. Here. The thing I wanted to point out is that even after we conclude the preliminary business case which we hope to do in the middle of next year, there is a long predevelopment process ahead of us which would involve obviously a very active engagement between the city planning department and

115
00:18:18.120 --> 00:18:22.009
DJ Baxter: and for lodges as the property owner and caltrain as well.

116
00:18:22.570 --> 00:18:34.490
DJ Baxter: Link 21, of course, is an effort to consider how we could carry rail service from Salesforce Transit City Transit Center to the East Bay.

117
00:18:34.500 --> 00:18:57.200
DJ Baxter: And the the big thing I wanna note really on this slide is that these all all these projects have very long timelines, so we're extremely excited about the benefits that can come from all of them. But it's really important to remember that they? They are they're many, many years away from completion, and in in some cases we still have many years of planning to do to bring these to fruition.

118
00:18:58.220 --> 00:19:05.220
DJ Baxter: So next, I just want to talk a little bit about how we're thinking about the rail yard site when we are undertaking the effort to think about.

119
00:19:05.710 --> 00:19:21.229
DJ Baxter: How can we, you know, continue and enhance rail operations for caltrain at this site, while also thinking about what would be possible in terms of a robust transit, oriented development here at Forth and King.

120
00:19:21.620 --> 00:19:46.479
DJ Baxter: And to do that, we really have to start with the core needs for operating the railroad. And so we've tried to synthesize these down to a couple of key categories on this slide. Just as a reminder. I mean, if you ride the train. You probably know all these sort of inherently. But when we're doing planning, of course, we have to be thinking about them very explicitly. And so we've categorized them into passenger facilities.

121
00:19:46.480 --> 00:20:09.680
DJ Baxter: all of the things that the passenger interacts with in order to become a trained passenger. And of course, those facilities themselves, as well as a number of other factors, have a big impact on the experience of our passengers, and our passengers are, are, you know, our top priority to us. So this experience and all the things that it entails are are top of mind. As we go through this planning process.

122
00:20:10.090 --> 00:20:38.579
DJ Baxter: We also on that sort of the back of house side. We need space to store trains. We need space to service those trains, to turn them around and head them in the opposite direction and space to start them up in the morning. There are all kinds of things, as we probably all know, that happen behind the scenes and during the night to get those trains ready for service, and those all consume space at the site. And so, as we're thinking about the planning of this site from a spatial spatial perspective, we have to make sure that all of those functions can be served.

123
00:20:38.800 --> 00:20:53.660
DJ Baxter: and of course there are people who conduct all those functions. Those are our crew and staff, and they need facilities, equipment, office space, all of those things in order to be successful at keeping the trains running day-to-day.

124
00:20:54.780 --> 00:21:09.749
DJ Baxter: If we go to the next slide, we've got a couple of slides here to start to think about the how these layout geographically on the site. I hope that these look familiar. Here. We've just outlined the core rail infrastructure that is at fourth and King today.

125
00:21:10.150 --> 00:21:17.049
DJ Baxter: But on the next slide we've just started to add, really the first layer of labels of functions. And and we do have

126
00:21:17.240 --> 00:21:36.030
DJ Baxter: a lot more things than we can possibly show on this slide. But just to give you a sense of all the different things that have to fit on this site from a function perspective. The headhouse, of course, is our passenger. Arrival and departure point interaction with the bus stops. We'll talk about that from a multimodal perspective. In a second.

127
00:21:36.030 --> 00:21:51.620
DJ Baxter: The bike station, also a key part of our multimodal function here. And then there are a lot of behind the scenes functions that have to happen here in terms of communications and equipment rooms offices and equipment for the staff who operate the trains.

128
00:21:51.800 --> 00:22:06.610
DJ Baxter: and so a few of those are laid out on the site here and just wanted to use this slide as a way to point out, there's there's a lot happening at Fourth and king today. And as we look at what the site might look like in the future, we have to be very cognizant of all, of of retaining or enhancing all of those functions.

129
00:22:10.290 --> 00:22:22.440
DJ Baxter: Another key component of this analysis is understanding. You know, the level of service that we plan to provide. And so this is rooted in Calcium's adopted service vision which has been adopted by the board.

130
00:22:22.520 --> 00:22:26.689
DJ Baxter: So today's service level is for caltrain trains an hour

131
00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:51.090
DJ Baxter: that but the adopted service level. The adopted service vision calls for us, expanding that to 8 Cal. Train trains an hour or doubling that service level eventually, and adding into the next 4 high speed rail trains an hour, and beyond that, even with additional investments. The Board has asked us to keep in mind the possibility of even further expanded caltrain service out to an additional 4 trains an hour.

132
00:22:51.200 --> 00:23:04.810
DJ Baxter: And this also has to be a key component of our analysis, because operating different levels of service requires different levels of infrastructure and equipment, and those things all have a have to have a place to sit on the site and to operate smoothly

133
00:23:06.540 --> 00:23:25.379
DJ Baxter: on the next slide. We wanted to hit some of Caltrain's core sort of guiding priorities as we look through. As we approach this work again in partnership with Prologis. Again I mentioned the adopted service vision. This is really an important guidepost for us. And here I wanted to mention, too, that

134
00:23:25.380 --> 00:23:47.220
DJ Baxter: even though we're looking at the Fourth and King Rail Yard, and it's defined geography. You have to remember that the Service vision and all the things. Caltrain does have system, wide implications. We have relationships with and commitments to a whole array of jurisdictions up and down the caltrain corridor and we have to make sure that as we plan this site

135
00:23:47.220 --> 00:24:01.350
DJ Baxter: that we understand clearly any ripple effects that might happen throughout the system throughout the calfine operating system. So honoring the adopted service vision, and all of that entails is is really at the top of our list. As we look at this site.

136
00:24:02.180 --> 00:24:17.350
DJ Baxter: we're also committed to maximizing e economic development opportunity and of course, that makes that makes our pro partnership with prologis even more important. As we're looking at how that could be realized.

137
00:24:18.450 --> 00:24:34.019
DJ Baxter: We're supporting the advanced calculations committed to supporting advancement of the existing and planned projects in the site. Earlier. I mentioned the electrification project that's underway today, the downtown extension and California high speed rail that are all working their way.

138
00:24:34.320 --> 00:24:52.250
DJ Baxter: And the the next one I wanted to talk about from a multimodal standpoint, and that is the station point of arrival at Fourth Street. Caltrain really functions as part of an ecosystem of mobility modes, and the 4 and Fourth Street is the place where is one of many places, of course.

139
00:24:52.250 --> 00:25:10.120
DJ Baxter: where all those modes come together seamlessly. And so, as we plan the site, we have to make sure that we're maintaining that focus so that all of the couch train passengers who are using couching system continue to have very fluid and seamless access to all the other modes of transportation that are available at this location.

140
00:25:12.120 --> 00:25:32.590
DJ Baxter: We need to make sure that the infrastructure we plan continues to support Caltrans current and future rail operations and maintenance needs. I think I touched on this a little bit previously. And again, I wanna under underscore this because it is so important that our customers experience has to be exceptional, and we will keep that in the forefront of our work as well

141
00:25:34.050 --> 00:25:54.740
DJ Baxter: on the next slide. I just wanted to be able to outline. You know, there, there are a lot of competing needs for this site as we look at all of the different things that that are being planned here the site is heavily utilized today, and throughout any kind of a phase development plan, Calcane will need to be able to maintain its ability to provide service.

142
00:25:55.270 --> 00:26:04.470
DJ Baxter: and if that phasing happens over a long period of time, we need to be able to provide increased levels of service as our as our

143
00:26:04.520 --> 00:26:07.639
DJ Baxter: plans and ridership warrant.

144
00:26:08.770 --> 00:26:34.840
DJ Baxter: So the technical work that we're undertaking is is trying to keep track of all of the competing needs for the site. And those are what we're trying to represent here, including the Fourth and Townsen station, as I mentioned earlier, underneath Townsend Street, potential lay down area at Seventh and Townsen, which is a space that the Tjpa would use for potentially staging construction activities.

145
00:26:35.000 --> 00:27:00.569
DJ Baxter: The prologis parcel is the long rectangle that you see on the site and the Dtx. Tracks in their alignment are indicated here in green, and the the Dtx tunnel is indicated in yellow. And of course the reason that Calvin is there today is that Calvin holds and a rail operating easement transportation operating easement on this site and and that enables us to operate the service that we do today.

146
00:27:02.810 --> 00:27:12.550
DJ Baxter: The next slide is a zoomed-out view of some of those projects. Just so you get a sense of where we sit in relation to the downtown extension alignment.

147
00:27:13.230 --> 00:27:34.719
DJ Baxter: and I'll close with the last slide, just noting that through all of this effort again, we're working closely with prologis to make sure that as we consider all the things that are important to couching from an operating perspective. We're also looking to try to combine those with all of the things that would make a commercial successful transit oriented development viable on this site.

148
00:27:34.770 --> 00:27:54.940
DJ Baxter: And so our challenge going forward is to find a way to optimize both of those interests, and hope that we can identify a path to retaining and enhancing caltrain service at the site, while also in enabling a successful transit rate to development here.

149
00:28:00.330 --> 00:28:03.250
DJ Baxter: Thank you. Dj, thanks. Dj.

150
00:28:03.580 --> 00:28:15.890
Allison Albericci: we'll open it up for questions and discussion, and I just want to note bruce is written in the chat. Don't forget safety of all the pedestrians in the area. And it's well considered. Thank you, Bruce, appreciate it

151
00:28:16.300 --> 00:28:17.260
DJ Baxter: absolutely.

152
00:28:21.850 --> 00:28:29.510
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): We have a few minutes for clarifying questions on this material. So if any one has any questions or comments.

153
00:28:30.520 --> 00:28:34.210
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): please feel welcome to raise raise your hand.

154
00:28:35.960 --> 00:28:39.310
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Yeah, II see a hand up.

155
00:28:42.130 --> 00:28:47.419
Hi! There! I mean someone started speaking. They could go before I can't before I do.

156
00:28:48.080 --> 00:28:50.199
Brent Van Brocklin: That's that's more than fun.

157
00:28:51.780 --> 00:28:53.740
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Was anyone else speaking?

158
00:28:53.980 --> 00:29:07.190
Roman Adler: Yeah. Sorry I had a question. I just I'm a little new to the scope of this project. I was just curious. Is the general intent that the rail yards move underground and and then above ground is is the commercial development site the prologis has.

159
00:29:08.030 --> 00:29:19.589
DJ Baxter: We're we're looking at a variety of options. The Dtx project in its current plan, would move most of calcane service underground into the Forth and Townsend

160
00:29:19.670 --> 00:29:25.239
DJ Baxter: Station, which is under Town Street and into the tunnel that connects to this salesforce transit center.

161
00:29:27.360 --> 00:29:29.300
Roman Adler: Gotcha. Okay, thank you.

162
00:29:30.320 --> 00:29:50.750
Brent Van Brocklin: Okay, Brent, if you wanna go ahead. Yeah, absolutely. Hi, there, thank you so much for your time. I am an avid transit fan, and I've been following this project. I'm working on this project for my capstone. And so I was wondering. I guess. Kind of like a decision. Wise. There is a lot of storage at Fourth and King right now.

163
00:29:50.750 --> 00:30:10.930
Brent Van Brocklin: But I know with plans for California high speed rail. They're working on a maintenance facility in Brisbane. Is there any possibility of like offloading some of that existing storage area from Caltrain to the new of, I mean, eventual site of maintenance for California, high speed rail. And like, what would that look like? Is that a possibility? Or

164
00:30:11.370 --> 00:30:15.450
Brent Van Brocklin: II, yeah, that was a lot of questions at once. Sorry.

165
00:30:17.530 --> 00:30:20.039
DJ Baxter: I'd say we no go ahead. Levi.

166
00:30:20.320 --> 00:30:30.799
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: Yeah. So we're right now. We're currently working on just through this technical analysis, really understanding what those storage needs are at this point. And so

167
00:30:30.900 --> 00:30:43.379
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: I think it's too early for us to talk about storage, really leaving the site. Because we're looking at. We're just looking at a variety of different options at this moment. And then, I think, in terms of

168
00:30:43.630 --> 00:30:52.750
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: Brisbane. We're not involved with the that high speed rail facility. And so at this point in time, that's not something that we're looking at.

169
00:30:53.340 --> 00:30:57.170
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: But I think it's a great question. Thanks so much. Brent. Dj, did you wanna add anything?

170
00:30:57.270 --> 00:30:58.490
DJ Baxter: No, thanks.

171
00:30:59.170 --> 00:31:00.729
Brent Van Brocklin: Okay, perfect. Thank you.

172
00:31:04.450 --> 00:31:07.339
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Anyone else with questions, for DJ.

173
00:31:10.530 --> 00:31:17.039
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I see no hands up. So I'm gonna suggest that we move on to the next item on the agenda.

174
00:31:17.570 --> 00:31:19.219
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Google, would you

175
00:31:21.120 --> 00:31:22.900
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: please? Yes.

176
00:31:23.210 --> 00:31:29.320
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: thanks, thanks, Erica. And good evening, everyone. Great to be here again.

177
00:31:29.760 --> 00:31:31.860
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: as you know, we

178
00:31:32.130 --> 00:31:45.340
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: for those of you who were in the meeting last time we talked about early mapping exercise on the surrounding areas for the site and the within our study area. And we also planned

179
00:31:45.410 --> 00:32:09.459
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and site tour that we completed in earlier, I think maybe last month from the month before. So where we are right now, basically, we are kind of like, we took information from those exercises and from the site basic to complete and our mapping exercise, input also from the different and people involved.

180
00:32:09.740 --> 00:32:15.930
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: That gave us their comment. And we started taking all that into

181
00:32:16.180 --> 00:32:25.639
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: start identifying preliminary areas for improvement and potential solutions within the site based on these mapping and observations.

182
00:32:25.990 --> 00:32:39.310
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Next slide, please. So we did do the site tour where we walked around and the different neighborhoods throughout the study area. Next slide, please.

183
00:32:39.600 --> 00:33:05.680
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: And we were able to sort of like, bring back a and get back to our mapping and sort of like fix a little bit things that were confirmed on site, and by comments from different people, we put some of those here and to lead us to the conclusions of a potential areas. Very, very preliminary that we start thinking of what, in

184
00:33:06.270 --> 00:33:14.670
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: which or where could be those we could do those interventions that could help improve the site

185
00:33:14.780 --> 00:33:37.479
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: in terms of the open space network. We know that. There's a lot of open spaces surrounding the side, but the access to it is a little bit limited, and we could definitely work on enhancing those connectivity, and ideally provide a future open spaces to where we don't see as much as we would like to see.

186
00:33:37.620 --> 00:33:41.040
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: And next slide. please.

187
00:33:41.750 --> 00:34:06.080
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Same thing about active ground floor. Obviously we are talking about a activity concentrated especially along the Third and Fourth street corridors and near the culture and station currently, but we also see a few pockets of other activities surrounding our site that could benefit from strengthening the connection to this. A pockets through the different neighborhoods

188
00:34:07.340 --> 00:34:08.670
next slide, please.

189
00:34:10.469 --> 00:34:16.950
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: One very important part of the conversation has been pedestrian network, and has to do with safety.

190
00:34:16.969 --> 00:34:38.979
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: has to do also with pleasant a and clear connections that link the different neighborhoods and the different pockets within neighborhoods to one another. We walked like, I said. They decide on the surroundings, and we found a number of possibilities of potential in future

191
00:34:39.320 --> 00:35:02.099
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: works that could enhance that experience and really enhance the linkage between neighborhoods. The linkage to existing and planned open spaces, providing better and clearer path through the site. So we started basically by updating identifying those areas where we

192
00:35:02.330 --> 00:35:16.710
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: find poor position, experience, and we also find a unsafe intersections for position movement. So, for instance, in this diagram, say little circles that are there in this orange red color in

193
00:35:16.910 --> 00:35:24.289
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: call out for those dangerous intersections where it has been actually in even accidents

194
00:35:24.390 --> 00:35:26.099
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: not too long ago.

195
00:35:26.150 --> 00:35:48.399
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and where position, safety is really really compromised, and, on the other hand, the little yellowish circles really provide or try to highlight areas where it is very unclear. The position connection is somewhat there, but it's not clear enough to facilitate that movement through the site.

196
00:35:49.090 --> 00:35:51.590
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Next slide, please.

197
00:35:51.810 --> 00:35:58.080
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: of course, deals. This also affects the road network, and we have again.

198
00:35:58.110 --> 00:36:14.280
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: dangerous intersections where cars and pedestrians collide all the time, and those probably need to be looked at. We have a bunch of roads that are like cut because of the existence of current infrastructure and the rail lines, and that

199
00:36:14.290 --> 00:36:24.470
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: provides again, kind of like a more a unclear or confusing a road network that could be somewhat improved

200
00:36:25.560 --> 00:36:26.650
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: next slide.

201
00:36:27.880 --> 00:36:37.189
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: We're also looking at. The sea level rise inundation map as we have in this slide, and mostly to understand a little bit

202
00:36:37.190 --> 00:37:01.449
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: a what the current condition is. We see that the low areas concentrate in Mission Bay and in the current a regular side and Thomson Street. But we also understand that a comprehensive sea level rise solution is something that has to be looked at as a larger scale, together with the smaller scale. But at least we start to sort of like, understand where we are. And what could be a micro solutions that would

203
00:37:01.450 --> 00:37:06.790
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: start implementing in our site that help enhance

204
00:37:06.890 --> 00:37:12.500
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: more a wider response to celebration. Climate resilience

205
00:37:13.140 --> 00:37:14.530
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: next slide, please.

206
00:37:15.210 --> 00:37:34.769
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: So with this mapping, we started looking a little bit at our site. And what do we have there? So right now? We see that a lot of the constraints are mostly related to major infrastructure. We do have the highway flyovers and the off ramps coming into our study area

207
00:37:34.770 --> 00:37:54.029
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and the existing rail lines that need to be there for quite some time, especially during the phase, one of the a religious project. So these are real and constraints in in terms of when we start looking at a long-term comprehensive a solution for the study area

208
00:37:54.520 --> 00:37:56.270
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and next slide, please.

209
00:37:57.310 --> 00:38:20.780
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: So in in terms of existing conditions, we're looking at a more consolidated urban corridors along like we said Third and Fourth Street, there's a growing open space system that is still somewhat a fragmented and disconnected. But there are plans to complete this open space, and we want, and we want to make sure that it is completed in a way that is in

210
00:38:21.950 --> 00:38:29.000
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: is consolidated and is connected, interconnected to to one another, and we have, of course,

211
00:38:29.070 --> 00:38:43.680
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: developments that are coming up. Some of them are almost finished, some other ones, like the mission-based school under construction on 1,450 Owen Street are already taking place and completing the picture within a or close to our study area.

212
00:38:44.610 --> 00:38:53.829
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Next slide. We also, like I mentioned, we have a planned activities meaning key sites in Central Soma

213
00:38:53.840 --> 00:39:16.319
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: for future, a development and decide that. I guess someone was pointed at there in with a new housing. Yes, development coming up very soon, like Alison mentioned. If that's moving forward first, we have other sites where there's a potential for

214
00:39:16.840 --> 00:39:26.859
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: densifying a development, especially along a central summer, as I said, and that also comes together with their own sort of like scale of a

215
00:39:27.120 --> 00:39:38.120
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: open space and position mobility. Again, also, we have the extension of the park along a mission creek and some other

216
00:39:38.150 --> 00:39:46.529
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: elements that complete the picture in terms of future, a open space and development possibilities

217
00:39:47.390 --> 00:39:59.810
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: next slide, please. So now, looking at that bigger picture and trying to put all these layers. Together, we start asking ourselves and asking the the working group

218
00:39:59.890 --> 00:40:05.349
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and asking the team members and those who went to the site, what could be those

219
00:40:05.510 --> 00:40:16.719
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: key intersections or basically key interventions. Sorry that we could take on to really create sort of like a maximum effect.

220
00:40:16.810 --> 00:40:23.670
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: We have a potential, a key, cross connections that would help us

221
00:40:23.730 --> 00:40:48.590
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: tie and stitch together Central Soma to Mission Bay, and to show show place, square, and really create a more interconnected and vibrant community through our study area. So some of these are identified here. And of course, we're not talking about yet about our solution. This could take different shape, and this would also take

222
00:40:48.770 --> 00:40:52.720
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: different timelines to really be possible

223
00:40:53.670 --> 00:40:54.720
implement.

224
00:40:54.750 --> 00:41:00.130
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: But if we look into them a little bit more in detail, so the number one here in the next slide.

225
00:41:01.040 --> 00:41:20.969
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: It's really taking advantage of the momentum that the future connection. And Bruce was talking about this earlier on the future connection of the pedestrian bridge over Mission Creek, and we do understand that whatever that may look like is something that is gonna have to be very, very carefully

226
00:41:21.010 --> 00:41:33.659
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: studied and consulted, and it has to be a joint effort with the community. But it will really provide a lot of benefit in connecting these communities. Now

227
00:41:33.680 --> 00:41:59.520
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: that position bridge that connects to the through the creek would also be even stronger if we see this connection expanding even longer through the regular sites and into the central Soma. So we can really look at access that crosses the site and connect different neighborhoods. Now this will take time, and at least during the what we understand from

228
00:41:59.670 --> 00:42:10.610
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: the introduction that was just given to us, at least during the early phases of the regular projects. This will probably not be

229
00:42:10.820 --> 00:42:15.439
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: possible, because a lot of the train operation needs to remain at grade.

230
00:42:15.490 --> 00:42:20.200
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: But we're looking into future possibilities together with that

231
00:42:20.350 --> 00:42:21.860
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and the next slide.

232
00:42:22.120 --> 00:42:42.359
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: There is also a potential of creating an elevated connection between Central Soma and Mission Bay alone. 6, 3 in this case may there may be a solution where we take advantage of the existing breach of the off ramp, and we could create some sort of connection attached to that to really

233
00:42:42.900 --> 00:42:45.519
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: provide this linkage that could

234
00:42:45.540 --> 00:42:53.529
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: be very needed in terms of connecting again these 2 different neighborhoods, and finally

235
00:42:54.390 --> 00:42:59.859
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: tours the south of the side and number 3. There's the potential extension of

236
00:42:59.900 --> 00:43:05.139
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: very straight and a public open space alone and over the future they

237
00:43:05.340 --> 00:43:07.119
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: the rail lines. If

238
00:43:07.220 --> 00:43:22.939
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: these are gonna be depending, of course, of the tunneling and the the technical implementation of this area. But it would be great way to also connect both the

239
00:43:23.080 --> 00:43:44.300
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: mission quick and mission pay back to Showplace Square and next slide, please. At the same time. Besides, this, cross connections were thinking, and I did I, and recognizing that there's like this long axis that are very different and very important throughout our study. Area. Towns and King and Berry Street are very, very different in character.

240
00:43:44.380 --> 00:43:59.289
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: and we want to make sure that that character remains, and that that character is a enhanced through whichever intervention we wanna do, especially Townsend Street, may benefit a lot through

241
00:43:59.640 --> 00:44:01.160
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: a future

242
00:44:01.360 --> 00:44:11.360
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: density opportunities and along the the site and also providing midblock connections that can facilitate again position, movement

243
00:44:12.260 --> 00:44:13.510
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: next slide.

244
00:44:16.100 --> 00:44:32.689
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: There's also, like a we were mentioning before an idea of that, whatever we do here and again, this is very early thinking about that. Whatever we do here, we can be thinking of the as a water sensitive public. We on. We can provide

245
00:44:32.910 --> 00:44:57.769
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: streetscape and parks and open spaces that really help us deal with in water management and and rotation ponds. And we'll provide purpose paving that I just add up to a larger scale a solution towards climate resilience. And there's different layers that we're talking, that the city is looking into.

246
00:44:57.900 --> 00:45:12.690
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: for instance, how to deal with a sea level rise. But we are saying that at the neighborhood level, the inner layer that has to do with streetscape, ring gardens, and the treatment even of the the Mission Creek Canal could help

247
00:45:13.020 --> 00:45:14.650
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: provide a solution

248
00:45:15.140 --> 00:45:16.470
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: next slide.

249
00:45:17.150 --> 00:45:27.270
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: These can take different shapes and forms. And this is just some examples that you can refer to when we talk about what it is rain card and our primable paving.

250
00:45:27.610 --> 00:45:30.349
Incorporated in streetscape design.

251
00:45:31.570 --> 00:45:40.119
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD:  so, yeah, in general, this is this where we are right now. Again, this is a

252
00:45:41.230 --> 00:45:49.829
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: preliminary study that has resulted from our conversations with the team. Our, this is to the side, and it's open to

253
00:45:49.930 --> 00:45:58.720
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: more of your comments to more of your ideas of what could be the connections you would like to see here

254
00:45:58.750 --> 00:46:10.670
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: a, or whether we're missing something we're overlooking something, or willing to pay attention into certain elements that you by being from the area, will really like us to

255
00:46:10.810 --> 00:46:12.199
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: pay attention to

256
00:46:12.630 --> 00:46:13.590
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Erica.

257
00:46:13.860 --> 00:46:26.660
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you. Google. We're gonna open it up to discussion. As as you explain, this is still an explorative item. So ideas, questions thoughts are are welcome from the from the group

258
00:46:30.090 --> 00:46:39.460
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): we? I did see a couple of things in the in the chat. I'll come back to the chat in a minute. Dylan, I see your hand up. Please go ahead.

259
00:46:39.880 --> 00:46:47.370
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): Yeah, thanks. And yeah, I'm I'm also kind of new to this conversation. So thanks for the overview

260
00:46:47.980 --> 00:47:06.130
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): and thanks for really, looking into pedestrian safety as well, I know that's something that's so important. Especially in this project area. I saw that one of the circled areas. One of the circled intersections was Forth and King, where, of course, there was that tragic crash earlier this year.

261
00:47:06.380 --> 00:47:16.850
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): And in just in in my interactions with with residents nearby, and folks a. A a couple of people mentioned that they wanted to see

262
00:47:17.330 --> 00:47:24.919
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders):  basically, that that block of Fourth street closed to private cars and and just made into a transit plaza.

263
00:47:25.300 --> 00:47:27.980
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders):  I know that's something that

264
00:47:28.480 --> 00:47:39.889
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): probably requires a lot of outreach and design, but II noticed that there was also a potential improvement there for Transit Plaza.  I could see it, as you know, a way of cutting down on.

265
00:47:39.930 --> 00:47:46.810
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): you know, making the intersection a lot safer. I know transit riders often, especially if it's the first time there have a hard time like understanding exactly

266
00:47:46.940 --> 00:47:56.989
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): where they should be waiting for their their streetcars, and and how to be connecting up to to Cal Train having to go across that big intersection can be pretty daunting. So

267
00:47:57.160 --> 00:47:58.249
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): I think

268
00:47:58.280 --> 00:48:04.780
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): II don't know. I like the idea. I wanted to see what you all were thinking when you mentioned Transit Plaza there and

269
00:48:05.150 --> 00:48:07.929
Dylan Fabris (SF Transit Riders): if that's something that you all could be considering.

270
00:48:14.840 --> 00:48:27.880
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: who? Who? Who? Who wants to answer that? Nothing. This is this is great common Dylan, and I think is, it would require such coordination between all the different parties in this meeting that, I think, is something that

271
00:48:28.300 --> 00:48:35.070
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: everyone is ideally looking in the same direction, having sort of like the same objectives. How that will shape

272
00:48:35.650 --> 00:48:51.529
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: it's probably too early, as Navy mentioned, also for the for the other question. But it's something that we need to to discuss. And again, I open to other ones if they have any specific comments regarding the Transit plaza in in forcing.

273
00:48:51.580 --> 00:49:08.359
Allison Albericci: Yeah? So I'll just to your question, Dylan. Currently, there are no plans to close a block of Fourth Street. However, pedestrian safety is a major priority of this project, and as is

274
00:49:08.420 --> 00:49:18.970
Allison Albericci: writer experience as are the levels of service for the pedestrians and the transit. So

275
00:49:19.500 --> 00:49:20.560
Allison Albericci: Yes.

276
00:49:20.750 --> 00:49:38.769
Allison Albericci: transit plaza is on the table. What? Exactly? It ends up looking like and and how how much of the right of way can be co-opted or or taken over that's part of the work that we're doing here.

277
00:49:41.650 --> 00:49:48.359
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you, Dylan. I don't see any other hands up, but I noticed Bruce, you had a comment in the chat

278
00:49:48.910 --> 00:49:54.449
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): about an issue, and I'm I just want to clarify if that relates to sea level rise.

279
00:49:56.580 --> 00:50:03.939
Bruce Agid: So the issue I brought up is the issue that Tammy articulated in the chat.

280
00:50:04.060 --> 00:50:08.430
Bruce Agid: and I gave it a plus one. And I remember, there was significant

281
00:50:08.490 --> 00:50:23.289
Bruce Agid: concerns around. I mean all the wonderful things of increased transit service which we really embrace and love.  between electrification of caltrain and high speed rail.

282
00:50:23.340 --> 00:50:28.470
Bruce Agid: If you don't deal with the The

283
00:50:28.510 --> 00:50:38.550
Bruce Agid: the Pax, the Pennsylvania Avenue extension. it will be it could potentially be catastrophic for folks who live in Mission Bay.

284
00:50:38.560 --> 00:50:46.990
Bruce Agid: because where you increase transit service and you have it above ground. It cuts off 2 arteries

285
00:50:47.260 --> 00:50:59.020
Bruce Agid: into Mission Bay, and that's Mission Bay Boulevard, north and South and Sixteenth Street, and I remember in the EIR. Tammy. Yeah, I can't remember exactly what it was, but

286
00:50:59.060 --> 00:51:03.030
Bruce Agid: it was like out of every hour

287
00:51:03.170 --> 00:51:08.540
Bruce Agid: there the gates would be down like 40% of the time.

288
00:51:08.610 --> 00:51:36.170
Bruce Agid: because there'd be such great transit service. You couldn't get to the hospital, and you couldn't get into Division Day if you happen to be on a bus at Sixteenth Street, or if you had to be in a car, cause you had a doctor's appointment or something like that. So that's what my comment was targeted to. And Tammy, I can't remember which er it was, but that was an area of consternation that we all were kind of

289
00:51:36.270 --> 00:51:38.100
Bruce Agid: in.

290
00:51:38.140 --> 00:51:40.479
Bruce Agid: We were all together on that concern

291
00:51:40.500 --> 00:51:46.120
Bruce Agid: around. You know the electrification and high speed rail. So that's clarification.

292
00:51:46.210 --> 00:51:48.360
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you, Brustami, please go ahead.

293
00:51:48.680 --> 00:52:01.680
Tammy Chan, UCSF: Yeah. Just you know, back to what Bruce is mentioning. I mean, I think it was with the with the calendar, Neir, as well as the maybe the Dtx. I think they have supplemental at some point that came through

294
00:52:01.810 --> 00:52:11.100
Tammy Chan, UCSF: and the city and Tjpa. We're we're in agreement that you know. This does need to go underground. You know, and

295
00:52:11.280 --> 00:52:12.290
Tammy Chan, UCSF: and

296
00:52:12.850 --> 00:52:25.869
Tammy Chan, UCSF: and our specific concern, I mean, aside from pedestrian safety is obviously the transport of our patients, like, you know, with the increase of additional traffic to Mission Bay already. You know we have seen an increase in

297
00:52:26.310 --> 00:52:50.049
Tammy Chan, UCSF: minutes which you know doesn't seem like a lot, but when you're transporting, you know, children and folks to an emergency hospital. The the. Those are very critical minutes, and I think one of the comments we are. The response we receive was like, well, emergency vehicles being ambulance have right away. Well, not when it comes to train crossings. So I mean, it's it's just, you know. It's it as much as

298
00:52:50.330 --> 00:53:04.639
Tammy Chan, UCSF: as you know, we. We support the idea of additional transit and additional all these additional movements into Mission Bay. I think we need to consider like what's already on the ground there, and the increase of of a lot of the

299
00:53:04.830 --> 00:53:06.219
Tammy Chan, UCSF: the

300
00:53:07.440 --> 00:53:30.120
Tammy Chan, UCSF: you know, with Covid, you know, we've had less traffic in Mission Bay. But of course, there, it's also change how people, you know are getting around. So so you know, unless we can get more people in better trans that we are getting more cars in a row, which you know additional delays. You know we see those delays happening to our shuttles. They get stuck at the Sixteenth Street crossing all the time. It! And there's nothing we can

301
00:53:30.230 --> 00:53:34.779
Tammy Chan, UCSF: do if you know it's coming down every you know several minutes. So

302
00:53:37.020 --> 00:53:50.369
Tammy Chan, UCSF: thank you, Tammy. So yeah, so we just wanna make sure that that that discussion with, you know, Dtx and Tgpa continues, and that the city takes that undergrounding a priority between Pennsylvania and the rail yard.

303
00:53:53.870 --> 00:53:55.090
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thanks, Tammy.

304
00:53:56.370 --> 00:54:00.009
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Anyone else has has any comments. I see

305
00:54:00.430 --> 00:54:04.060
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): another couple of questions in here.

306
00:54:05.970 --> 00:54:11.519
Allison Albericci: So I see a question from Chris about what's the plan for the caltrain? Muni station?

307
00:54:16.020 --> 00:54:27.620
Allison Albericci: Chris, can you clarify? Is that Are you speaking about the the stop that's on street for Muni or something else.

308
00:54:27.830 --> 00:54:36.289
Chris Paik: Yeah, the station that's located adjacent to to Caltrain Station. I was just wondering if that's also gonna be relocated.

309
00:54:39.220 --> 00:54:45.769
Allison Albericci: There are no plans to relocate that station at this time. But that is

310
00:54:45.800 --> 00:54:47.879
Allison Albericci: part of the purview of this study.

311
00:54:48.380 --> 00:54:51.239
Allison Albericci: And can you can you?

312
00:54:52.120 --> 00:54:54.090
Allison Albericci: is, do you have a

313
00:54:54.130 --> 00:55:04.710
Chris Paik: a concern or a preference or a no, no, we're just talking about thoroughfares. And you know, if that station remains where it is that would limit some of the options that we have.

314
00:55:05.690 --> 00:55:06.610
Allison Albericci: Yep

315
00:55:08.540 --> 00:55:11.229
Allison Albericci: noted. Thanks, Chris.

316
00:55:12.810 --> 00:55:15.900
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): there's a comment from Cruoty as well.

317
00:55:16.610 --> 00:55:23.909
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I'm not sure if you'd like to add to that, I think it relates to our conversation around packs. Go ahead.

318
00:55:25.540 --> 00:55:40.739
Krute Singa: Yeah, I just I I'm this might be just in the weeks. But you know, mentally, or like, maybe more psychologically, it just feels like when you're in that neighborhood. It just feels disconnected from other neighborhoods. So any kind of visuals like way finding signs

319
00:55:41.090 --> 00:55:52.959
Krute Singa: just showing that the you know the distance to this neighborhood or landmark. Is not that far? I think, would be one way to also kind of help the pedestrian realm, and not that.

320
00:55:54.100 --> 00:55:54.860
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Yeah.

321
00:55:58.590 --> 00:55:59.569
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): thank you.

322
00:56:00.340 --> 00:56:10.240
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Anyone else. We'll go. I think we'll we'll be distributing this presentation and and you'll be receiving comments additional comments right from the diagrams.

323
00:56:10.340 --> 00:56:11.950
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Yes, sure.

324
00:56:15.190 --> 00:56:24.059
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: Yeah. I just wanted to add really quickly, I know that there was questions and concern regarding the Pennsylvania Avenue, and I

325
00:56:24.500 --> 00:56:25.790
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: I think.

326
00:56:26.290 --> 00:56:39.040
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs:  I think that those are questions that in terms of like just ongoing, planning efforts would be best directed to Sfcta, and I know, Erica. Request. Erica said, that she's making notes on

327
00:56:39.410 --> 00:56:46.520
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: just a tracker with Sf. Planning, so I think it's a good question for follow up. But I just wanted to make sure Dtx is looking at

328
00:56:46.820 --> 00:57:00.830
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: the extension and very much so in in the phase of the tunnel to Stc. And then the rail yards work is observing. You know that again, the analytical framework between what's feasible in terms of

329
00:57:00.900 --> 00:57:26.820
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: commercial development and having an active, really art site. And then Pax is really the set that the agency lead is Sfc, ta, so I just wanted to make sure that folks understood. We're definitely we can definitely communicate these concerns. But that is a, you know city led project. And so it's important to make sure that folks are also sharing with with the with the ta as well.

330
00:57:29.750 --> 00:57:32.150
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you. Navi Bruce, please go ahead.

331
00:57:33.290 --> 00:58:02.949
Bruce Agid: Yeah. Navy. Thank you for those. That those comments, and you know, message loud and clear. The only thing you you need to be cognizant of, and we all do is that all these projects are moving forward, all at the same time creating similar types of issues and concerns, and anything that appears to be addressing one issue could be exacerbating another issue. And so the reason why you have folks like myself and Tammy and others bringing it up is that

332
00:58:02.950 --> 00:58:16.110
Bruce Agid: you know it is what it is. It's on the table. People know what the issue is but this team, when we see plans, we need to know the understanding of, does it make it even worse?

333
00:58:16.700 --> 00:58:34.879
Bruce Agid: Because if anything we do in this. Anything we talk about here makes those issues worse. Then that needs to be on the table, right? And we're seeing it and feeling it right now. With the Mission Bay Elementary School. We just had this wonderful conversation with Sf. Cta.

334
00:58:34.980 --> 00:58:52.709
Bruce Agid: And the congestion that's already in the area without a school, and as much as we would like public transit and bikes and other alternatives to autos. When you get parents in a room they talk about. Yeah, that's all great.

335
00:58:52.720 --> 00:58:56.230
Bruce Agid: But I've got to come with my car and drop my kid off and pick my kid up.

336
00:58:56.370 --> 00:59:19.050
Bruce Agid: and we all know what it looks like today with pedestrian safety, and so on, and so on and so on. So we just wanna make sure that we, you know, have the obligation to articulate our concerns and want to make sure that this project team, you know, captures them, and you know we'll make sure that the other agencies know. But they already know what the issues are. So I just wanted to

337
00:59:19.050 --> 00:59:37.760
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: share that. Thank you. Yeah, yeah, definitely. And II just wanna say, you know Bruce and Tammy. I so appreciate the feedback, and I wanna make sure that you all are aware that we'll definitely will do the internal communication as well to our agency partners and make sure that they're looped in on this, because I think that there's a

338
00:59:37.770 --> 00:59:53.079
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: responsibility to also be advocating between, you know, agencies that are au often engaging with one another. And so I just wanted to make sure that I also shared just, you know, additional insights on what can help make sure that voices being heard. So II really appreciate your

339
00:59:53.240 --> 00:59:59.189
Navi [she/her], Caltrain Gov Affairs: your feedback here, and it definitely is not falling on deaf ears. So thank you, Bruce, and thank you. Tammy

340
01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:11.460
Allison Albericci: and Bruce and Tammy. I'll just mention very quickly that we are aware that Cta's starting up the pre environmental study for Pax

341
01:00:11.560 --> 01:00:17.359
Allison Albericci: and our team Member Amnon, who's on the call tonight?

342
01:00:17.430 --> 01:00:30.530
Allison Albericci: is part of that working group team. So we are tracking with that project, and we'll continue to express the concerns we've heard tonight to our partners at Cta.

343
01:00:40.720 --> 01:00:42.669
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Great, thank you. Any other comment.

344
01:00:44.200 --> 01:00:49.750
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thoughts more more related to the public realm. As I mentioned earlier, the

345
01:00:49.820 --> 01:00:53.959
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): the document will be available for review and additional comment.

346
01:00:54.820 --> 01:01:08.909
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So everybody's welcome to look into that in more detail. Please let us know about those crossings that that you see getting a little more tricky and complicated. Please feel welcome to bring them to Google's attention in the document.

347
01:01:10.730 --> 01:01:29.980
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Okay, well, with that, I think we have. We're already 4 min over our our time. I'm gonna be very, very brief with this last item, and then I'm gonna pass it on to Alison. And if there are any additional comments or clarifying questions we can go back to those in the end.

348
01:01:30.070 --> 01:01:42.500
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So I'm coming back to you with an update on the context dashboard. I also just very briefly wanted to let you know that as feedback is coming through, I'm incorporating your comments in the public participation framework.

349
01:01:42.500 --> 01:02:00.269
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): They are in track changes. So you can see where we've been making changes to the document. And we're hoping to update the schedule of public participation events and and the strategies just to meet where where we are with the with the project and and project partners.

350
01:02:00.280 --> 01:02:05.650
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So that will be coming to you for the next next time we meet.

351
01:02:05.710 --> 01:02:08.380
Okay, so the

352
01:02:08.570 --> 01:02:33.059
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): context dashboard. This is the executive summary of executive summaries that we've been asked to look into. And hopefully, it'll be a tool. So you can review previous planning policy documents and community input in relation to the themes that are emerging in that are emerging in these meetings, but also new city policy, like the environmental justice framework.

353
01:02:33.710 --> 01:02:35.340
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Next slide, please.

354
01:02:35.600 --> 01:02:43.099
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): There is a link in this presentation to the context. Dashboard the context. The the dashboard is A is an Excel file.

355
01:02:43.290 --> 01:02:50.149
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning):  basically what it does it. It connects the themes that have emerged at the rail yards, working group meetings

356
01:02:50.290 --> 01:03:03.110
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): with existing neighborhood plan goals or recommendations or community input and where they fit with in terms of the environmental justice frameworks and priorities.

357
01:03:03.380 --> 01:03:15.149
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I'm not gonna have a chance to go in detail. But we've made a a small video that is also at the same saving the same collaborative location.

358
01:03:15.180 --> 01:03:35.919
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So the video will take you through what the what the parts of the dashboard are and and how to use it. It's mostly to filter by theme, so that you can see what policies, goals, and objectives are. Are there to support some of the themes that are emerging from our conversations?

359
01:03:36.190 --> 01:03:42.509
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I'll send with the meeting minutes also a link to the video, a direct link to the video.

360
01:03:42.620 --> 01:03:44.470
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): And next slide, please.

361
01:03:45.030 --> 01:03:56.710
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): II wanted to share just very, very quickly this analysis that we did so, based on the documents that we have analyzed so far, which are listed here.

362
01:03:57.090 --> 01:04:01.199
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): broken down by the themes that have come up in this group

363
01:04:01.210 --> 01:04:14.170
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): which include the balance of economic viability, operational needs and community benefits, community services, ground floor activation and use open space and streets, connectivity, housing and equity.

364
01:04:14.410 --> 01:04:28.999
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): What we can see is that there are certain themes, which are very well supported in these policy documents, including community services. As you can see there open space and streets connectivity.

365
01:04:29.150 --> 01:04:37.910
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So hopefully, the the dashboard will provide an overview of what the prior efforts are, but also some of the ongoing efforts.

366
01:04:38.090 --> 01:05:00.679
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and perhaps a sense of of confidence that we're not leaving any of these efforts behind, but that we're able to bring them forward with us. And that the work advancing these elements that have been discussed in this meeting is is supported by by policy, but also by prior community. Input

367
01:05:00.890 --> 01:05:08.740
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): so I'd really I'd be very curious to hear your feedback. I'll leave it with you for a synchronous review.

368
01:05:08.780 --> 01:05:24.360
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Please feel welcome to leave comments and and just, you know, or send us a send us an email because we continue to work on the dashboard, adding new input and and just working for completeness and consistency.

369
01:05:24.540 --> 01:05:35.530
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): So thank you, I hope you get a chance to explore it. And because we're running out of time, I'm gonna pass it on to Alison to take us through our our closing and next steps.

370
01:05:39.850 --> 01:05:45.590
Allison Albericci: Thanks, Erica, and and thanks everybody for the input and the the great comments.

371
01:05:46.520 --> 01:06:02.580
Allison Albericci: so we have a lot of work to do on our plate. Of course. We continue to benefit from the coordinator support. Thank you so much to.

372
01:06:02.620 --> 01:06:18.530
Allison Albericci: The folks who helped us! Pull together this agenda and helped us prioritize the conversation. We are also looking to continue putting together opportunities to meet in person.

373
01:06:18.610 --> 01:06:31.799
Allison Albericci: And this was something suggested by one of our coordinators. Don, I think, introduced this idea on. Unfortunately, I don't think he was able to make it tonight. But,

374
01:06:32.110 --> 01:06:34.220
Allison Albericci: We will look for

375
01:06:35.010 --> 01:06:48.410
Allison Albericci: opportunities to meet import in person. And and also we're looking forward to your continued review of the context dashboard on the city team side. We're going to follow up

376
01:06:48.570 --> 01:06:49.620
Allison Albericci: on

377
01:06:49.680 --> 01:06:54.860
Allison Albericci: the policy framework with the other Cac's

378
01:06:54.890 --> 01:06:58.769
Allison Albericci: and thank you, Bruce, for providing some contacts for us?

379
01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:24.769
Allison Albericci: We're gonna start looking specifically at our public realm strategies toolkit. And Hugo sort of hinted where we're headed with that with one of his last slides on the the types of interventions, for example, that could help with storm water management. So we'll be looking at a kind of a toolbox of strategies.

380
01:07:24.770 --> 01:07:35.059
Allison Albericci: backing away a little bit from the the full network analysis and and going more into detail and then

381
01:07:35.370 --> 01:07:37.309
Allison Albericci: zooming back out

382
01:07:37.490 --> 01:07:40.980
Allison Albericci: at a later time. So

383
01:07:41.050 --> 01:07:42.860
Allison Albericci: we have that on our list.

384
01:07:43.050 --> 01:07:49.200
Allison Albericci: We're going to be coordinating with the portal packs and the Sixth Street Sewer project

385
01:07:49.270 --> 01:08:01.119
Allison Albericci: and we're gonna be thinking a lot about how to communicate the complexity of the site and all of the infrastructure as well as the timing

386
01:08:01.200 --> 01:08:10.450
Allison Albericci: and the issues of of phasing. So that's where we're sort of headed.

387
01:08:10.600 --> 01:08:25.870
Allison Albericci:  What we'd like right now is is for your thoughts on how we proceed with this group in the first quarter of 2024. So the reality is.

388
01:08:25.979 --> 01:08:34.359
Allison Albericci: There's certain work that we can advance, and we are going to advance that, and there's plenty to do.

389
01:08:34.479 --> 01:08:44.010
Allison Albericci: We are also needing to allow the preliminary business case that caltrain is working on

390
01:08:44.040 --> 01:08:45.869
Allison Albericci: to advance.

391
01:08:45.880 --> 01:09:01.390
Allison Albericci: and it is taking a bit longer than we anticipated. A year ago, when we set out the timeline for the work that we would be doing in parallel. So I wanted to put it out to this group.

392
01:09:01.540 --> 01:09:06.280
Allison Albericci:  you know there, there are some options for how we can

393
01:09:06.340 --> 01:09:07.869
Allison Albericci: meat

394
01:09:07.899 --> 01:09:14.979
Allison Albericci: next quarter. Of course, a touch point in February, maybe with some possible

395
01:09:15.050 --> 01:09:16.740
Allison Albericci: site walks.

396
01:09:16.859 --> 01:09:27.339
Allison Albericci: and this could include another group tour of the area surrounding the rail yard. We've also heard some interest in the Mission Rock project

397
01:09:27.380 --> 01:09:36.450
Allison Albericci: and perhaps facilitating a tour of that project as it's coming out of the ground. And then

398
01:09:36.550 --> 01:09:41.960
Allison Albericci:  For March, which would be our normal

399
01:09:42.140 --> 01:09:48.910
Allison Albericci: first quarter check-in time we we may have a formal meeting

400
01:09:49.010 --> 01:10:01.630
Allison Albericci: similar to what we've had here, or we also have the option of doing something more social or something that is a combination of both. So

401
01:10:01.840 --> 01:10:05.719
Allison Albericci: for the working group members. Do you?

402
01:10:05.740 --> 01:10:19.460
Allison Albericci: Do you sort of have any preferences about that or other ideas in terms of how you would like to engage with us and with each other. In the next quarter.

403
01:10:35.800 --> 01:10:44.220
Krute Singa: I'll I'll just you know II was part of the coordinators. But I would just

404
01:10:44.770 --> 01:10:58.240
Krute Singa: you know, put a plugin for more site tours and kind of engaging with other folks on the working group that way. I think that would just be helpful to to get site tours and and talk about the project

405
01:10:58.560 --> 01:11:01.170
Krute Singa: at the site itself. Yeah.

406
01:11:01.810 --> 01:11:03.850
Allison Albericci: thanks, Krudy. Much appreciated.

407
01:11:10.650 --> 01:11:15.500
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): I see a comment from Michael as well that that he is

408
01:11:15.750 --> 01:11:27.029
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): He supports the a synchronous work that we've been doing on documents and presentations, and we will continue that, Michael. Thank you for the feedback and for providing comments.

409
01:11:37.870 --> 01:11:41.390
Allison Albericci: Okay? Oh, I see. Go ahead, Liz

410
01:11:47.090 --> 01:11:50.009
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Lisa's added to the chat that

411
01:11:50.040 --> 01:12:05.900
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): she would like to be able to meet in person, and was sorry to me miss the previous tour. Yeah, we we will also are learning lessons. So next time we'll definitely provide more lead times to make sure more people can

412
01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:10.329
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): can join us. So thank you, Liz, we'll keep that in mind.

413
01:12:10.740 --> 01:12:16.990
Liz Kirby (she/her): Awesome. No, thank you so much, Erica. I was sad to miss the last one. So that's a possibility. I think that would be great.

414
01:12:17.950 --> 01:12:19.200
Allison Albericci: absolutely.

415
01:12:21.360 --> 01:12:26.299
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): and Tammy, appreciating materials ahead of meetings as well.

416
01:12:26.620 --> 01:12:38.280
Erika Uribe (consultant w/ SF Planning): Thank you. Tell me, in some materials we're working till the last minutes and last minute, and we're unable to share earlier, but as much as possible we will continue to to try to provide materials ahead.

417
01:12:39.230 --> 01:12:41.700
Allison Albericci: Yes. Note taken.

418
01:12:43.640 --> 01:12:44.610
Allison Albericci: Okay.

419
01:12:47.770 --> 01:12:54.150
Allison Albericci: if if that is, all the thoughts. I just really wanna thank everybody

420
01:12:54.260 --> 01:13:20.070
Allison Albericci: for your time and and for for making the time to to be here with us tonight and and to engage in this work. We're we're just so thankful for your contribution and hope. Everybody has really just a joyous, delightful holiday season and a happy New Year, and we look forward to seeing you again in January or February.

421
01:13:23.650 --> 01:13:31.490
Hugo Errazuriz, AECOM UD: Great! Thank you. Thank you. Happy holidays, thanks everyone. Thank you so much.